Magnet Mount Antennas are for Temp Use only??
- Loudmouth
- Donor
- Posts: 630
- Joined: January 19th, 2007, 8:01 am
Magnet Mount Antennas are for Temp Use only??
Hi, I just read that magnet mount antennas should be considered for temporary use only, and that they will never work as well as a permanently mounted antenna.
Is this true?
Thanks,
LM
Is this true?
Thanks,
LM
OK, I'm not Bopper but here's why I do it. I have seen all sorts of stuff get under or attach to my mag mounts. Little flakes of metal are the worst. What will happen is they will stick to the magnet and will rust whenever they get wet. Pretty soon you'll have a large rust spot where the magnet is.Duck Commander wrote:Hey Bopper why would you need to check under the magnets every so often?
Rawjo so if your not worried about the paint it should be no big deal?
Just wonderin my brother has a 79 K-5 Blazer and he had the whole outside of it sprayed with Linex and im thinking of doing mine this way if you think about it it is really a lifelong paintjob that looks perty cool to me will the magnets get ground worth a crap threw this stuff or will i have to do sumpn else with my antenna instead of a mag-mount?
Just wonderin my brother has a 79 K-5 Blazer and he had the whole outside of it sprayed with Linex and im thinking of doing mine this way if you think about it it is really a lifelong paintjob that looks perty cool to me will the magnets get ground worth a crap threw this stuff or will i have to do sumpn else with my antenna instead of a mag-mount?
- Loudmouth
- Donor
- Posts: 630
- Joined: January 19th, 2007, 8:01 am
Thanks guys. There is so much conflicting information out there it's frustrating sometimes.
I think everyone would agree that the most ideal situation is hard mount the antenna right in the center of the truck/car roof. But if you don't wanna drill a hole through your roof, would it be better to go with a mag mount in the center of the roof, or hard mount the antenna somewhere else? Say on the tool box in the back of the truck bad?
I think everyone would agree that the most ideal situation is hard mount the antenna right in the center of the truck/car roof. But if you don't wanna drill a hole through your roof, would it be better to go with a mag mount in the center of the roof, or hard mount the antenna somewhere else? Say on the tool box in the back of the truck bad?
- Bigpimp347 [UK]
- Donor
- Posts: 649
- Joined: December 12th, 2006, 8:48 am
- Handle: Worldwide 347
- Real Name: Mark
- Call Sign: M5ADU
- Antenna: big one
- Radio: lots and lots.
- Contact:
Hawkeye,hard mounts are the best way to go because then your whole auto is one big ground and you can just forget about it up there when it comes to blistering,moisture build up,and so forth.with mag mounts just check it once in awhile like the good people here say and you can hook a ground wire to the mag mount then to your frame if your going to be running some nice power.
If you run big watts with a mag mount you might blister you paint, I mean big watts, I ran a 8 pill with a mag mount no problem,,,,,Magnet mount antennas actually get their ground through "capacitive coupling" with the metal of the vehicle. The capacitance that the magnet forms with the surface of the vehicle is what couples the RF circuit to the body of the car.
- rattlesnake
- Duckplucker
- Posts: 125
- Joined: August 15th, 2010, 6:09 pm
- Real Name: chris
- Radio: cobra 29 nw classic
I use a wilson 1000 mag mount it seems to do good for me..
199 OVER HERE IN CENTRAL FLORIDA...
Think about it. If you want a good solid electrical connection, how do you do it? A good mechanical connection (and electrical) seems like a very sound idea. Isn't that how it's mostly done? So, why would you want to use a magnet if there wasn't some very good reason? I can certainly understand why someone wouldn't be thrilled with drilling holes in a new car (I just got one!), but what do you want, performance or 'looks'?
Is there a huge difference in performance between the two types of antenna mounting? Not always, but there certainly can be.
- 'Doc
Is there a huge difference in performance between the two types of antenna mounting? Not always, but there certainly can be.
- 'Doc
Last edited by 'Doc on October 6th, 2010, 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- DanTaylor
- Donor
- Posts: 263
- Joined: October 5th, 2010, 6:33 pm
- Real Name: Jason
- Radio: Galaxy 959
- Contact:
Just be careful with water getting underneath it. That can change your SWR's. Ive run mag mounts in the past and they work just fine. As to the asked question earlier about running a mag mount on top of Line X no it wont work you cant get it planted firmly down on top of basically rubber.
WORK TRUCK Galaxy 959 peaked and tweaked with echo
PLAY TRUCK Cobra 29 NWST peaked and tweaked
BASE Uniden Washington with a swing kit and a D-104
[ external image ]
PLAY TRUCK Cobra 29 NWST peaked and tweaked
BASE Uniden Washington with a swing kit and a D-104
[ external image ]
My thoughts exactly. Why mess around with a mag mount that could damage your paint anyway? Put a on a permanent mount and be done with it.'Doc wrote:Think about it. If you want a good solid electrical connection, how do you do it? A good mechanical connection (and electrical) seems like a very sound idea. Isn't that how it's mostly done? So, why would you want to use a magnet if there wasn't some very good reason? I can certainly understand why someone wouldn't be thrilled with drilling holes in a new car (I just got one!), but what do you want, performance or 'looks'?
Is there a huge difference in performance between the two types of antenna mounting? Not always, but there certainly can be.
- 'Doc
Mag mounts may be RF grounded, but I highly doubt they are DC grounded.