imax 2000 groundplane

This forum provides help with antenna installation, as well as guidance on selecting the right antenna for your radio or mobile setup.
Post Reply
User avatar
MO-raven
4 PILL USER
4 PILL USER
Posts: 25
Joined: May 6th, 2010, 10:09 am
Real Name: Cherry

imax 2000 groundplane

#282231

Post by MO-raven »

we are running a max 2000 and thinking about adding a groundplane to it. I havn't heard much about those ground planes and was wondering what everyone's opinion on them?
User avatar
heavyD
Skipshooter
Skipshooter
Posts: 279
Joined: February 2nd, 2010, 10:27 am
Handle: Heavy-D
Real Name: mike
Antenna: imax, steel whip
Radio: galaxy,cobra,uniden
Contact:

#282236

Post by heavyD »

ground plane on an imax is really for looks in my opinion(or another way for the manufacturer to make a few mor bucks. From researching this site I can say the opinion veries about 55/45 against ground plane(close).. the antenna is really nothing more than a dipole. not taking any thing away from the antenna it is well put together and affordable, I got one. But even if the ground elements were effective they are far too short. would like do see some experimentation with some home brews starting off of the imax.. that stuff is beyond me though
Heavy-D. 529 in the Pile
User avatar
Sporty Mike
Wordwide & Qualified
Wordwide & Qualified
Posts: 1,631
Joined: November 13th, 2009, 5:02 pm
Real Name: Michael
Antenna: S.S. 102 / Maco V5/8
Radio: Alot of 'em!!
Contact:

#282243

Post by Sporty Mike »

I agree with Heavy D....and I'll add that a Ground plane kit won't hurt you at all....just don't be surprised if you notice 0 improvement as well.
I believe the applications were a GPK has helped are in situations were the antenna's very high like 50 feet and higher, with little topographical obstructions.
Because after all, that's what the GPK is supposed to do, LOWER your angle of radiation. So think about, if your antenna is 40 feet to the base or lower, in a hilly or tree spewn area, do you really wanna lower your angle of radiation?? :confused:


Mike
Redbeard 759 , your non profit Prophet from the 'Bam!!!
User avatar
MO-raven
4 PILL USER
4 PILL USER
Posts: 25
Joined: May 6th, 2010, 10:09 am
Real Name: Cherry

#283780

Post by MO-raven »

well, that was exactly what I was wondering.... there is obviously a reason why I haven't heard much on it. Now we are in the ozark mountains and in a bit of a hole as we call it, but the imax is on top on a 58' tower. My husband says that the tip of the antenea is right at the tree tops, or at least very close to the tree tops at the top of our little hill....We are doing our darndest to crawl out of this old hole... lol
User avatar
420Snowman

#283796

Post by 420Snowman »

Alright, another person from MO!!! About time, I am in Wright City MO.......


Snowman
User avatar
MO-raven
4 PILL USER
4 PILL USER
Posts: 25
Joined: May 6th, 2010, 10:09 am
Real Name: Cherry

#283807

Post by MO-raven »

LOL...... Nice to meet ya 420snowman! I'm originally from the Lou.... Moved away back in 97. Live south of Branson now.... Great place to live! :icon_e_wink:
User avatar
420Snowman

#283869

Post by 420Snowman »

I lived in Branson for 5 years, thats where my wife and I met!! I havent been back there in at LEAST 6 years, dont miss that Hwy 76 traffic AT ALL!!! I ran the kitchen at Mickey Gilleys and also at Paradise Grill, (right next to Shoji Tabouchi).. not sure what it is now.....

Snowman
User avatar
231

#283874

Post by 231 »

If the Imax acts anything like the A99 (with exception of it's wavelength is similar in design), then height will likely play a large role of "how much" difference you might expect. At around 60' (or so) to the base of the antenna, I'd expect you'd probably see some improvement (if only a little). My Imax is currently only at 40' to the base which is why I never bothered. But back when I was using the A99 I did some experimenting to see how much difference it made in my installation. At around 40' to the base there was no noticeable difference...at least long distance local. At 90' to the base however, it was quite noticeable. Somewhere to the tune of 1/2 s-unit (maybe a tad more) if I recall.

So the results of the experimenting I did indicated (to me anyway) that height played a huge role in the results...at least in my installations. But I'd expect soil properties (and a variety of things) would come into play as well.

Just my thoughts on the subject.
User avatar
likes2grill
Duckplucker
Duckplucker
Posts: 105
Joined: May 16th, 2010, 5:33 pm
Real Name: Dan
Radio: Midland 79-290
Contact:

#283939

Post by likes2grill »

This is what I plan on doing with my final install of my imax2000 at 40' with the ground plane kit on it. [Please login or register to view this link]
1394
User avatar
'Doc

#283956

Post by 'Doc »

With that Imaxx, that grounding amounts to a safety ground, has very little to do with the antenna behaving 'right'. There are also several 'mistakes' in that 'Signal Engineering' explanation! Soldering is a particularly bad way of connecting safety ground conductors. That sort of connection seldom (if ever) survives a hit, or near hit from lightning. Those connections should be of a mechanical nature unless you are going to weld them. It's detailed in the National Electrical Code (NEC), which is a very nice thing to read about grounding.
As far as running a ground wire/cable down a metal tower, why not just use that tower as the ground wire? It's how it's typically done on most commercial towers. I think I'd be safe in saying that tower will conduct more than any wire/cable the average person ever uses for grounding. Then just make a mechanical connection to any ground radials at the base of the tower (where it can be seen!).
I would very much recommend taking a look at that NEC thingy! It has a lot of useful information in it and not just about grounding. And since it's used as a standard reference by most city/county and states, it can certainly help with legal things.
- 'Doc
User avatar
1342
4 PILL USER
4 PILL USER
Posts: 32
Joined: March 28th, 2008, 1:47 am

#288883

Post by 1342 »

MO-raven wrote:we are running a max 2000 and thinking about adding a groundplane to it. I havn't heard much about those ground planes and was wondering what everyone's opinion on them?
heres mine with 102 and maco gpk
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
str8stroke
Donor
Donor
Posts: 953
Joined: April 30th, 2010, 2:49 pm
Real Name: Ric Flair
Antenna: 1/16 Wave Dipole
Radio: Gold Cobra 29LTD
Contact:

#288896

Post by str8stroke »

I put the GPK on my ole 99, and noticed no performance improvement. What I did notice was a drop in RFI around the house.
Ric Flair is on the Air, with Pink Underwear!!! WHAOOO!!!
Post Reply